Re: Replies as attachments on this list...

[Andrea Giuliano <a.giuliano@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

PFJ wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date:
> Mon, 6 Sep 2004 11:10:24 +0200
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> > Attachments should be you used to add some extra information to a 
> > message, or to send out binary data, not to hold a message. At least I 
> > think so, feel free to say I'm wrong (but please explain why).
> >    
>
> As long as you're not objecting to legitimate gpg signatures, I'm happy.
>
> TTFN
>
> Paul
>  
If I understand your point (sorry, my English is not as good as it may 
appear), you mean that a good place to put a gpg signature is an attachment.

I'm not familiar with GPG, but I guess it should be OK.

Best regards.

--
Andrea Giuliano, Ph. D.
ICCU - Istituto Centrale per il Catalogo Unico
Viale Castro Pretorio 105, Rome - ITALY
Tel. +39064989509, Fax +39064059302