On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 22:08, Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > ok, it seems something is the matter with AGP. here's an excerpt from my X > log.: > > (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error "xf86_ENOMEM" > (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP > (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel > (II) fglrx(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0x3297d000 at 0xf6e13000 > (WW) fglrx(0): *********************************************** > (WW) fglrx(0): * DRI initialization failed! * > (WW) fglrx(0): * (maybe driver kernel module missing or bad) * > (WW) fglrx(0): * 2D acceleraton available (MMIO) * > (WW) fglrx(0): * no 3D acceleration available * > (WW) fglrx(0): ********************************************* * > > so this definantly has something to do with the new nforce2 mobo i'm using, > right? thanks again. > > Christopher J. Bottaro wrote: > > > i installed the ATI drivers in FC2 a while ago and they worked great. > > since then, i've installed a new motherboard (nforce2) and they stopped > > giving me > > 3d acceleration. i uninstalled/reinstalled the drivers but still no 3d > > acceleration. lsmod shows that fglrx is loaded, but all my 3d apps run at > > like 1 frame per 2 seconds. > > > > any suggestions? thanks for the help. > > > > Christopher, There is a parameter in the xorg.conf/XF86Config-4 file regarding which AGP method to use. I cannot find the documentation on-line, but it's in the ATI-specific options. The default is to use the built-in ATI agpgart. You could try using other values. IIRC there is a comment in xorg.conf/XF86Config-4 explaining the different options. Sorry, I cannot be more specific, I do not have the driver loaded at the moment. Bob...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
