Re: route (is it forwarding packets?) (sorry if duplicate).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 03:02, Chadley Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 14:17, Bob Chiodini wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 08:59, Chadley Wilson wrote:
> > > Greetings Guys,
> > > 
> > > I am trying to understand this but I am confused! :=\
> > > Is this table forwarding packets from one iface to the other?
> > > 
> > > [root@chadlin root]# route
> > > Kernel IP routing table
> > > Destination     Gateway  Genmask     Flags Metric Ref    Use
> > > Iface
> > > 192.168.10.0    *      255.255.255.0   U     0      0    0 eth0
> > > 196.25.100.0    *      255.255.255.0   U     0      0    0 eth1
> > > 127.0.0.0       *      255.0.0.0       U     0      0    0 lo
> > > default         *      0.0.0.0         U     0      0    0 eth0
> > > [root@chadlin root]# 
> > > -- 
> Interesting I have installed Fedora 2 on my Home PC and FC1 my server at
> work. They are not linked in any way.At work I have two address ranges
> and at home I have on.
> I noticed last night at home that route was returning a route for a
> network I never setup and never installed.
> This morning I checked my route on my server and the same route is
> there. My home PC has absolutley no internet access. an like wise my NFS
> server. 
> 
> Here is the routing table,
> 
>  [root@preload RPMS]# route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination   Gateway     Genmask        Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface
> 192.168.10.0  0.0.0.0     255.255.255.0  U     0      0        0 bond0
> 169.254.0.0   0.0.0.0     255.255.0.0    U     0      0        0 bond0
> 127.0.0.0     0.0.0.0     255.0.0.0      U     0      0        0 lo
> [root@preload RPMS]#
> 
> I configured the bond device but there is no IP range of 169.245. on any
> of my networks. Where does this come from?

That route is part of the zero configuration project.  You can get rid
of this by adding the line:

NOZEROCONF=yes 

to the /etc/sysconfig/network file.

To learn more about this do a google on Zero Conf.  From what I
understand it is an attempt to setup systems such that when they are not
given any config information via DHCP or statically they would
spontaneously setup networking so they could talk to similarly
un-configured systems.

Now why anyone would want this I don't know.  And why it mucks up the
routing tables when you do have networking configured I don't know. 
Personally it looks like a huge security hole that will explode when
enough systems have been infected with this stuff.

-- 
Scot L. Harris <webid@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux