Re: VDQ : FC1 > FC2 ??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:10:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:


>> Urk. I needed an embarrassing amount of help when FC1 was still newish;
> 
> Well, upgrading RHL/FC has always required more experience and
> "handcrafting" than that required by other distributions ;-)

Oddly enough, unless I've lost more memories that I think, I had no very
great trouble getting from 7.2 to 8.0, nor 8.0 to 9. I never managed 6.x
at all, and had to have my friendly local Alpha Plus Nerd install 7.2 and
hack a connection to DSL from it; since then, with a lot of help from the
Net, I've mostly managed ....

> However, the amount of problems, I was facing after upgrading to FC2
> exceeded the amount of problems, I was used to face when upgrading
> previous versions of RHL/FC.

> ATM, I would have to lie to recommend to get started with Linux with FC2
> to beginners. They probably are better off choosing a different
> distribution.

OK, given several years' experience with RH (and a couple with YellowDog),
and none with any other *ix, which? Whitebox seems eminently
unapproachable to the uninitiated. I've been trying to follow
gmane.linux.whitebox.user, and can't even tell what the posts are about
... :-(

> However, I can recommend FC2 to professional sysadmins, to advanced
> Linux/*nix users, to developers, to those who aren't scared about going
> after problems, if something doesn't immediately work and to those who
> want to "play and learn" with a Linux-system.

I have no doubt it does those things, and I don't mean to complain of
that; but I am emphatically none of the above.

> As I see it: RH had promised FC to be closer to the bleeding edge, now
> we (the users) are facing the consequences. Admitted, RH could have done
> better, but I also don't see much reason to bash them, because they
> could have done much worse.

I  hope nobody here thinks I'm bashing either RH or FC. I just don't want
to be an endless hindrance with questions and problems that are both
elementary and dumb.

I want linux of some flavor, knowing I can tweak anything whatever,
if/when I feel the need; and I'd defend myself in any way necessary
against anyone who tried to force me back to MegaScat (or the detestably
counter-intuitive Apple Interface, either!) -- and expect any sane jury to
acquit me, if it came to a trial.

But I don't want to *have* to tweak things before I can start using them
(and finding out what tweaks suit me); and I don't want to get blindsided
by security holes. Yum and cron are a great help, bless them!

-- 
Beartooth Autodidact, curmudgeonly codger learning linux
Remember I know precious little of what I'm talking about!





[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux