Re: VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:56:39 -0400 (EDT)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Beartooth said:
[snip]
> It seems to me there's a broader point here; somebody please correct me
> as called for. My very limited understanding while mulling RH9's 
> then-approaching EOL and replacements, and watching LUGs...
[snip]

Don't make assumptions from other people's assumptions.

http://fedora.redhat.com/about/
http://fedora.redhat.com/about/objectives.html


-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?
    • From: Beartooth

• References:
  • VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?
    • From: Beartooth

• Prev by Date: Re: eth + dhcp weird behavior
• Next by Date: Why build kernel for minimum size?
• Previous by thread: VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?
• Next by thread: Re: VVDQ : Replace Fedora after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread