Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



checking on /usr/bin/gs shows no dependency on gtk+ :
$ ldd /usr/bin/gsx
        libgs.so.7 => /usr/lib/libgs.so.7 (0x00556000)
        libgtk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 (0x0015a000)
        libgdk-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgdk-1.2.so.0 (0x00d07000)
        libgmodule-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libgmodule-1.2.so.0 (0x00b63000)
        libglib-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 (0x00c39000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00468000)
        libXi.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x00111000)
        libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x00119000)
        libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x002a2000)
        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x00127000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x00d3f000)
        libVFlib2.so.24 => /usr/lib/libVFlib2.so.24 (0x00380000)
        libttf.so.2 => /usr/lib/libttf.so.2 (0x003b3000)
        libpng12.so.0 => /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0 (0x003d9000)
        libjpeg.so.62 => /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62 (0x00fb2000)
        libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0x00149000)
        libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x003fd000)
        libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x0044e000)
        libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x0046b000)
        libgimpprint.so.1 => /usr/lib/libgimpprint.so.1 (0x00b66000)
        libcupsimage.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcupsimage.so.2 (0x004a3000)
        libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0x004b6000)
        libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0x00e78000)
        libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0x00456000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0048d000)
        libtiff.so.3 => /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 (0x004d2000)
        libssl.so.4 => /lib/libssl.so.4 (0x00513000)
        libcrypto.so.4 => /lib/libcrypto.so.4 (0x00fd0000)
        libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00cf9000)
        libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00b4e000)
        libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00c5e000)
        libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00482000)
        libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00cc7000)
        libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x00c27000)

So removing the duplicate /usr/bin/gsx and removing the requirement in
the .spec file could resolve this packaging bug. Or am I overlooking
something? 

David Jansen



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux