Re: FC1 ghostscript update requires gdk-pixbuf and gtk+?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 11:28, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > I think this is something I'm going to have to let the Fedora
> > Legacy project address if need be -- but I do wish that I hadn't
> > started down this path in the first place.
> >
> > Sorry for the mess.
>
> Which mess?
>
> ghostscript/FC2 requires gtk2 and gdk_pixbuf2, ghostscript/FC1
> requires their gtk1 counterparts, where is the problem?

Think of a small text-only server with hylafax. Hylafax needs 
ghostscript. And ghostscript pulls in urw-fonts, urw-fonts 
needs /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontscale (provided by XFree86-font-utils) -> 
libXfont.so.1 (provided by XFree86-libs) -> freetype. This is just 
*one* path of dependencies. The effect is that I don't have a text-only 
server, now I have a lot of X stuff that I don't want. And the next 
logical step is to install gtk+ and gdk-pixbuf?

> Ralf

Andreas.



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux