Re: maximum mount count

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: maximum mount count
From: "Thomas Cameron" <thomas.cameron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 01:10:52 -0500
References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed Sawicki" <ed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "For users of Fedora Core releases"
<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 1:44 AM
Subject: Re: maximum mount count

> No, I run fsck manually with Slackware and it works - the filesystem
> is OK. Yet, Fedora sees the filesystem as corrupt.

Is it possible that Slack is checking it as ext2 and FC is checking as ext3
or vice-versa?

Thomas

References:
- Re: maximum mount count
  - From: alan
- Re: maximum mount count
  - From: David L Norris
- Re: maximum mount count
  - From: Ed Sawicki

Prev by Date: Re: mdmpd fails to start.
Next by Date: Re: fedora ppc
Previous by thread: Re: maximum mount count
Next by thread: Redundant network config files?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]