Hi, I think I know what "inappropriate content" is being referenced here, but I can't help but think that someone has a bit of an overactive imagination. ;-) The patterns are quite random, and that general configuration is, statistically speaking, probably fairly common due to it's simplicity and general similarity to the original cube, with only slight rotations of rows. There are, no doubt, parallels to evolutionary development, since, in the context of evolution, the simplest tool to get the job done usually wins. ;-) -Steve
