Re: rpm or pam bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:

Hi,

whenever I upgrade some packages for which there are i386 and x86_64
versions installed the configuration files are created as .rpmnew or
saved as .rpmsave files. Comparing these files almost always shows that
they are identical.

rpm -q --queryformat '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' pam
pam-0.77-50.x86_64
pam-0.77-50.i386

warning: /etc/pam.d/other created as /etc/pam.d/other.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/access.conf created as /etc/security/access.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/chroot.conf created as /etc/security/chroot.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/console.perms created as /etc/security/console.perms.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/group.conf created as /etc/security/group.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/limits.conf created as /etc/security/limits.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/pam_env.conf created as /etc/security/pam_env.conf.rpmnew
warning: /etc/security/time.conf created as /etc/security/time.conf.rpmnew

Tom

What's your question Tom? The above looks quite normal to me.

Regards,
Ed.




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux