----- Original Message ----- From: <fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 6:52 AM Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 5, Issue 144 > Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx > > You can reach the person managing the list at > fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: /proc/acpi/sleep (Jeff Vian) > 2. Re: fc1 : Which mysql version? (Jeff Vian) > 3. Re: Network connection problem (Mike Klinke) > 4. SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. (Naoki) > 5. RE: Driver for D-link wireless network adapters (Ryan Krauss) > 6. Re: Burning ISO images to CDs (Mike Chambers) > 7. Re: SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. > (Jeff Vian) > 8. Re: SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. > (Jeff Vian) > 9. Re: Sound instability - HDW pb (Philippe) > 10. Re: Update Problem (ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1) (Micheal) > 11. Re: Vmware and samba (Wolfgang Gill) > 12. Re: Static in speakers.... (Steven Stern) > 13. Re: /proc/acpi/sleep (Globe Trotter) > 14. Re: samba (Thornton) > 15. Re: SCSI controller problems (Stewart Nelson) > 16. Re: sound stopped working (david walcroft) > 17. Re: Getting Wireless Work in Fedora (vlad i.) > 18. Re: SCSI controller problems (Jeff Vian) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:41:56 -0500 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: /proc/acpi/sleep > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089600116.3792.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 20:18, Globe Trotter wrote: > > Thats interesting, because I had specifically put in acpi-off in my menu.lst. > > > > Should it be acpi=off? {acpi-off is what Satish had suggested and no one seemed > > to object?} > > > > acpi=off > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:46:27 -0500 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: fc1 : Which mysql version? > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089600387.3792.68.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 20:46, William Hooper wrote: > > Jeff Vian said: > > [snip] > > > HUH???? PHP is GPL. > > > > Someone forgot to the the PHP authors then. > > > > http://us3.php.net/license/3_0.txt > > > > > > -- > > William Hooper > > > duh-oh! Guess I did not search as well as I thought. > > In any case, the OP was asking about something that was beaten to death > several months ago. The archives are full of the discussion on mysql > and the licensing issue. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:51:55 -0500 > From: Mike Klinke <lsomike@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Network connection problem > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <200407112151.55661.lsomike@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Sunday 11 July 2004 18:52, Peter Greenwood wrote: > > lsomike@xxxxxxxxxx said: > > > Is the AAAA query an IPV6 query? > > > > So it says here: RFC 1933 section 3.2. > > > That was my best guess, but, then why would one of your first two DNS > requests be an IPV6 query if you turned IPV6 off? I'm not up to > speed on the IPV6 subsystem but to me it just seems odd. > > Regards, Mike Klinke > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:56:11 +0900 > From: Naoki <naoki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40F1FDCB.5020908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Hi all, > > I have a problem, when I install my OS ( FC2 ) on my nice machine > with an internal scsi controller my two disks are sda and sdb, which is > all nice and expected. But then when I add a new scsi card and hook up > the external disk array the new array now becomes sda which has a very > negative effect, can't boot.. > > Any helpful hints? I could label the disks sure but then swap is still > on sda2 and that's a problem. > > -n. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:05:54 -0600 > From: "Ryan Krauss" <ryanfedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Driver for D-link wireless network adapters > To: "'For users of Fedora Core releases'" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <00c401c467bd$2603a730$6b00a8c0@RYANLT> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I would try e-mailing d-link tech support. They were quick to e-mail me > back with a list of driver sources. > > This page also chipsets to help identify Ethernet cards: > http://www.linux-wlan.org/docs/wlan_adapters.html.gz > It does list the DWL-610 as having a Realtek chip, so I have no advice > on that driver. > > Ryan > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karol Pluciennik > Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 4:37 PM > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > Subject: Re: Driver for D-link wireless network adapters > > Ryan Krauss wrote: > > Please visit http://support.dlink.com/faq/view.asp?prod_id=357 for > Linux > > drivers. > > Yes ... what if I have D-Link DWL-610? It's available in Europe only. I > can't find it here and now I have no idea where to start. If it helps I > used RTL8180L driver from Realtek but only under kernel 2.4.20 :( > > > If you have an atheros based card, feel free to e-mail me if you want > > more info on what I did to get mine working. > > Yes, sorry for posting my problem in several threads but I was away for > a while and I couldn't write posts :(. > > -- > Regards, TroLoo > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:06:56 -0500 > From: Mike Chambers <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Burning ISO images to CDs > To: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089601616.7212.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, DENNIS TURNER wrote: > > I've downloaded the images for FC2, and the first installation CD I > > burned works ok, but the second repeatedly generates the notice that > > there is no disc checksum on the CD. I used a Windows-based > > application (Roxio CD Creator) to burn the CDs, and am at a loss as to > > why the first CD works, but the second fails. Any suggestions on > > where I've gone wrong? > > Check yours discs and/or iso images. Maybe one and/or both are bad? > > -- > Mike Chambers > Madisonville, KY > > "It's always better to hurt a little now, than to hurt a lot later!" > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:26:09 -0500 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089602769.3792.96.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 21:56, Naoki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem, when I install my OS ( FC2 ) on my nice machine > > with an internal scsi controller my two disks are sda and sdb, which is > > all nice and expected. But then when I add a new scsi card and hook up > > the external disk array the new array now becomes sda which has a very > > negative effect, can't boot.. > > > > Any helpful hints? I could label the disks sure but then swap is still > > on sda2 and that's a problem. > > > > The order of the scsi adapters being configured at boot time causes > that.... first adapter --> first device ==> sda. AFAIK the easiest way > to fix that is to swap the positions on the mobo so the original adapter > is seen first. > > BTW, by the time you labeled the partitions you could also change fstab > for swap as well as the filesystem partitions. The real problem I would > see is the location of the grub boot image. > > HTH > Jeff > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:32:45 -0500 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SCSI disk names change when adding / removing devices. > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089603165.3792.104.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 21:56, Naoki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have a problem, when I install my OS ( FC2 ) on my nice machine > > with an internal scsi controller my two disks are sda and sdb, which is > > all nice and expected. But then when I add a new scsi card and hook up > > the external disk array the new array now becomes sda which has a very > > negative effect, can't boot.. > > > > Any helpful hints? I could label the disks sure but then swap is still > > on sda2 and that's a problem. > > > > -n. > > > > BTW, For your planning for future use of scsi.. AFAICT, scsi devices > are named in the order seen. It is thus necessary to know which adapter > will be seen first, as well as the scsi ID of the drives. > > On the bus of a single adapter, drives are named in ID sequence. If you > have a drive with id 5 and another with id 9, the first will be sda and > the second will be sdb. If you add one at id 8, it becomes sdb and the > one at id 9 is now sdc. If you then add one at id 0, all the ones with > higher ids are bumped to different names. > > Thus for simplicity you should fill the scsi ids starting at 0 and going > sequentially so you do not have unexpected problems of this sort. > > Then you also have to know which pci slots are probed first so you do > not have the problems you just saw. > > It is easy once understood, but can be puzzling for the uninitiated. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 10:38:59 +0700 > From: Philippe <phd2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Sound instability - HDW pb > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089603539.2747.29.camel@xxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 00:17, Philippe wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 00:00, netmask wrote: > > > > Where does this instability come from ? Do I have to think that a reboot > > > > should fix the problem, as I used to think on another OS before ;-). Or > > > > do I have a hardware problem ? But anytime I boot in RH9, I always have > > > > sound ... > Simple test .. I just unplugged my speakers and put my headphones ... > stupid test, but this is working now ! I think I have a intermittent pb > with the jack of my speakers. > > Philippe > -- > Philippe, Chiangmai, Thailand > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:46:14 -0500 > From: Micheal <sundance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Update Problem (ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1) > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089603974.2360.3.camel@Fedora> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 20:53, Barry Yu wrote: > > Patrick Boutilier wrote: > > > > >å¤?æ-O wrote: > > > > > > > > >>Hi all, > > >> > > >>I received this error message below when running yum(or rpm) to apply > > >>the newest ppp-2.4.2-3.FC2.1 update: > > >> > > >>"pppd < 2.3.9 conflict with Initscripts-7.53-1" > > >> > <snip, snip> > > This is a bug, had been asked at least more than 20 times in 2 days > > since this ppp appeared in the up2date repository. I guess just have to > > wait until it is fixed and put into the repository, if any other updates > > avilalbe, you can use the method as below; > > "Same answer I'm giving to everyone else: It's a know bug. Has been > > fixed and a fix is in CVS. Meanwhile , use yum --exclude=initscripts > > --exclude=ppp --exclude=pppd upgrade to update your system , while the > > corrected package isnt available. -- Pedro Macedo" > > -- > > > > Or another alternative, point your yum/up2date to the > development/rawhide repos by editing the appropriate config file and > update ppp ONLY. Then remove the development/rawhide repo from yum.conf > or /etc/sysconfig/rhn/sources > > Worked for me. Though I do not have dial-up. > > Micheal > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:52:34 +1000 > From: "Wolfgang Gill" <wolfgang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Vmware and samba > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040712034641.M48457@xxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 02:11:16 +0200, Raúl Moratalla wrote > > Hi! > > > > I have tried to configure samba with vmware for share files between > > Linux and my virtual machine (windows me) but I can't see in my > > virtual machine the directory that I share in Linux. I read some > > documentation about samba, I modified the file > > /etc/vmware/vmnet1/smb.conf and I added a network connection in > > Windows Me but I am a newbie with networks and I can't get it > > working :( > > > > I will very pleased if anyone could explain to me all the steps that > > I need for sharing files between Linux and vmware. > > > > Regards, > > > > Raul > > Temporarly turn off your Firewall and see how that goes. I've had similar > problems with Samba, in that I could see the share (I use Linneighborhood to > do this, in KDE), but I couldn't mount it. Turning off the firewall then > allowed me to mount the share. I still have not found out which port is being > blocked, but when I do I'll need to add it to the firewall script. (That's if > anyone else knows which port has been added to Samba that the standard > firewall rules don't know about.) > > Wolf > -- > Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:01:36 -0500 > From: Steven Stern <subscribed-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Static in speakers.... > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <g734f01sbe7euk5tmp89skcdetjd7eil3k@xxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:28:21 -0500, Andrew Konosky <TerranAce007@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > >I have a Logitech speaker system and am using the onboard sound on my > >Giga-byte GA-7DX motherboard (Creatve CT5880 SoundBlaster PCI 128), so I > >don't have anything real fancy, but I never had any static under > >Windows. When the speaker system is powered on, I can hear a hiss coming > >from it. When I play music, it isn't noticeable until I turn the volume > >up high. I'm guessing its a driver issue or something. Any suggestions > >on how to get rid of it? > > This has been discussed before. The usual solution is to open up the volume > control app and disable inputs until the static goes away. It's usually one > that refers to something you don't have. :-) > -- > Steve > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:13:24 -0700 (PDT) > From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: /proc/acpi/sleep > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040712041324.95134.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > --- Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 20:18, Globe Trotter wrote: > > > Thats interesting, because I had specifically put in acpi-off in my > > menu.lst. > > > > > > Should it be acpi=off? {acpi-off is what Satish had suggested and no one > > seemed > > > to object?} > > > > > > > acpi=off > > Thanks! This is the story -- it works fine now!! > > Thanks again, everyone!! > > Best wishes!!! > > > > > > > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:45:33 -0700 > From: Thornton <thornton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: samba > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089607533.4128.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > that did it. i will have to tweak my firewall some > > thanks > > On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 23:47, SoftCell wrote: > > i had the same problem, you might want to look at your firewall and > > try to disable it then you'll see the shares > > > > On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 23:30:34 -0700, Thornton <thornton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Is there any trick to getting samba working on core 2? > > > > > > I type smb//server/share and i get login info. type it in then i get > > > something that says share doesnt exsist > > > > > > i know it is a correct share > > > > > > what am i doing wrong? > > > > > > thanks > > > > > > > > > -- > > > fedora-list mailing list > > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > > > > > > > -- > > - Jake > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 21:49:09 -0700 > From: "Stewart Nelson" <sn@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SCSI controller problems > To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <008001c467cb$9398c060$1101a8c0@w2ksn> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > >> sym53c8xx: at PCI bus 3, device 12, function 0 > >> sym53c8xx: setting PCI_COMMAND_PARITY...(fix-up) > >> sym53c8xx: 53c875 detected with Symbios NVRAM > >> sym53c875-0: rev 0x26 on pci bus 3 device 12 function 0 irq 5 > >> sym53c875-0: Symbios format NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, Parity Checking > >> sym53c875-0: on-chip RAM at 0xfeafd000 > >> sym53c875-0: restart (scsi reset). > >> sym53c875-0: Downloading SCSI SCRIPTS. > >> scsi1 : sym53c8xx-1.7.3c-20010512 > >> blk: queue dc299c18, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) > >> Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-7000 Rev: T306 > >> Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 > >> blk: queue dc299a18, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) > >> Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 > >> sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray > >> st: Version 20030406, bufsize 32768, max init. bufs 4, s/g segs 16 > >> Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 > >> sym53c875-0-<0,*>: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s (100.0 ns, offset 15) > >> sym53c875-0: detaching ... > >> sym53c875-0: resetting chip > >> scsi : 1 host left. > > > Have you checked the scsi ID on both devices?? If they are the same it > > WILL NOT work. > > I realize that, but am still in the early stages of testing, > and only physically connect one device at a time (shutting down and > powering off, before moving the cable to the other device). > > In the example above, the DAT was connected to the SCSI bus, > and the DVD-RAM connected via IDE. Fedora allocated scsi0 to > the 'SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices' and > scsi1 to the 53c875 hardware controller. The DVD-RAM is on > (virtual) ID 0 of scsi0 and the DAT is on ID 0 of scsi1, so there > should not be a conflict. > > I tried not connecting anything to the secondary IDE port; > scsi0 is still assigned to emulation (with no devices), > and the tape on scsi1 still does not work. Also tried the > tape on ID 1, to no avail. > > I discovered that the problem is related to the 'detaching ...' > that occurs. If I manually modprobe the adapter, the > device gets attached again and it is accessible :) > Unfortunately, this is not a complete workaround, because > e.g. running Hardware Browser causes it to get detached > again. > > Any ideas on why the detach occurs? > > Thanks, > > Stewart > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 15:27:06 +1000 > From: david walcroft <david_walcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: sound stopped working > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <40F2212A.8060306@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > Dick Brown wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm quite a newbie, so please bear with me. I don't use sound too > > much, so I'm not sure when this happened, but my sound stopped working. > > I'm using KDE 3.1.4-5, with FC1, although I don't get any sound with > > Gnome, either. I have found that other users are getting sound, > > however. I've gone into the KDE control center and turned on all > > messages. Now, when I log in, I get the following message: > > > > Sound server warning message: > > Can't set real-time scheduling priority. > > You need to run artswrapper as root or > > setuid root. This means that you will > > likely not be able to produce acceptable > > sound (i.e. without clicks and breaks) > > > > I've run 'ps -A' and can't find artswrapper running at all. I've also > > googled for a solution, but all I've found so far are lots of others > > with sound problems. > > > > Recent modifications (I don't know if these were before or after the > > sound problems) include: > > java installation > > normal up2date updates > > > > Thanks for any help, > > Dick > > > > > Try this: > ls -l /usr/bin/artswrapper = -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5700 Oct 23 2003 / > > As root # chmod 6755 /usr/bin/artswrapper > gives artswrapper setuid root and should cure your artsd. > > david > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: 12 Jul 2004 05:31:06 -0000 > From: "vlad i." <vlad@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Getting Wireless Work in Fedora > To: "fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <20040712053106.43916.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040712/d575fb8a/attachment.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:52:15 -0500 > From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: SCSI controller problems > To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <1089611535.2831.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Sun, 2004-07-11 at 23:49, Stewart Nelson wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > > > >> sym53c8xx: at PCI bus 3, device 12, function 0 > > >> sym53c8xx: setting PCI_COMMAND_PARITY...(fix-up) > > >> sym53c8xx: 53c875 detected with Symbios NVRAM > > >> sym53c875-0: rev 0x26 on pci bus 3 device 12 function 0 irq 5 > > >> sym53c875-0: Symbios format NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, Parity Checking > > >> sym53c875-0: on-chip RAM at 0xfeafd000 > > >> sym53c875-0: restart (scsi reset). > > >> sym53c875-0: Downloading SCSI SCRIPTS. > > >> scsi1 : sym53c8xx-1.7.3c-20010512 > > >> blk: queue dc299c18, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) > > >> Vendor: SONY Model: SDT-7000 Rev: T306 > > >> Type: Sequential-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 > > >> blk: queue dc299a18, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0xffffffff) > > >> Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 > > >> sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 32x/32x writer dvd-ram cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray > > >> st: Version 20030406, bufsize 32768, max init. bufs 4, s/g segs 16 > > >> Attached scsi tape st0 at scsi1, channel 0, id 0, lun 0 > > >> sym53c875-0-<0,*>: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s (100.0 ns, offset 15) > > >> sym53c875-0: detaching ... > > >> sym53c875-0: resetting chip > > >> scsi : 1 host left. > > > > > Have you checked the scsi ID on both devices?? If they are the same it > > > WILL NOT work. > > > > I realize that, but am still in the early stages of testing, > > and only physically connect one device at a time (shutting down and > > powering off, before moving the cable to the other device). > > > > In the example above, the DAT was connected to the SCSI bus, > > and the DVD-RAM connected via IDE. Fedora allocated scsi0 to > > the 'SCSI host adapter emulation for IDE ATAPI devices' and > > scsi1 to the 53c875 hardware controller. The DVD-RAM is on > > (virtual) ID 0 of scsi0 and the DAT is on ID 0 of scsi1, so there > > should not be a conflict. > > > > I tried not connecting anything to the secondary IDE port; > > scsi0 is still assigned to emulation (with no devices), > > and the tape on scsi1 still does not work. Also tried the > > tape on ID 1, to no avail. > > > > I discovered that the problem is related to the 'detaching ...' > > that occurs. If I manually modprobe the adapter, the > > device gets attached again and it is accessible :) > > Unfortunately, this is not a complete workaround, because > > e.g. running Hardware Browser causes it to get detached > > again. > > > > Any ideas on why the detach occurs? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Stewart > > > > I missed the fact this shows as 2 scsi adapters. :-( > > Possibly termination causing the disconnect? > > In general, scsi buses must be terminated at both ends. With only one > device attached on the cable (other than the adapter) it should be > terminated either at the end of the cable or at the device (which should > be at the end of the cable if no termination is there). > > I found that with only one drive (a Maxtor ultra 160 that cannot be > self-terminated) that I can get by without terminating the drive but it > is the only device on the cable. (there is some penalty in performance, > and the adapter is only scsi FW.) However, if there is a second device > attached nothing works until I add a terminator. I had to order a cable > with termination on the cable since the drive cannot provide the > termination for this. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > > > End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 5, Issue 144 > ******************************************* >
