Am Do, den 08.07.2004 schrieb Mike Chambers um 15:44: > On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 09:25 -0400, Philip A. Pearson wrote: > > thanks, I was using linux 9. I went to the fedora page and downloaded > > the 64 core and burned 4 CDs. I then did a clean install from those > > CD's. that was about 3 days ago. Good, now we know that it is a clean new install and no upgrade and that it is the x64 version of Fedora Core 2. > > I just ran the command that you suggested and got: > > > > xorg-x11-devel-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-devel-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-libs-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-libs-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGL-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.7.0-2 > > xorg-x11-Mesa-libGLU-6.7.0-2 > > I haven't been following this thread, but from this email, it looks like > there are *two* packages of same version for the ones above? You may > need to remove one of each of the ones above to help solve it? Right, wonders me too that some packages appear twice. That is not correct. Maybe someone with much more insight into the current x64 situation should comment that. > Mike Chambers Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3 Serendipity 16:09:24 up 22:17, 10 users, 0.01, 0.11, 0.14
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
