On Thursday 01 July 2004 19:45, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > Guys, > > I'm doing Spamass-Milter currently. Don't have much spam to train > on though. I only have like 18 spam mails. > > Just wondering, which is the better alternative? I got > spamass-milter from dag's repo and seems like it's out of > development vs Milter-Spamc which is in active development. > If the mailing list is any indication, it's still actively maintained: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/spamass-milt-list/2004-06/threads.html > > Spamass-milter seems to work OK except that I it doesn't really > _yet_ know how to differentiate spam & Ham > If we are talking about the same "spamass-milter" from http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/ "A little plugin for the Sendmail Milter (Mail Filter) library that pipes all incoming mail (including things received by rmail/UUCP) through the SpamAssassin, a highly customizable SpamFilter." it never will learn to differentiate since its main purpose in life is to sit between your Sendmail Mail Transport Agent and SpamAssassin to simply pipe mail to SpamAssassin, which in turn, does all the analysis and learning. Regards, Mike Klinke
