On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 13:18, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > 148 Rodolfo J. Paiz > > I've clearly got to keep my mouth shut more often. <grin> > Would hate to lose the valuable input. :) > I would suggest that this output would be more interesting if clients were > somehow "grouped" as in this case where roughly 350 posts were sent with > SquirrelMail. Also, I just took a quick peek at the numbers, but they added > up to somewhere near 6,000 as opposed to the 8,100 posts total. Do the > other 2,100 posts not have a mailer-ID? You might also want to cut off from > the list those mailers used to send less than 10 messages, just for brevity. > I debated this when I put that in. I should be able to shorten it and lump all the brands together but thought it was interesting to see the variety of versions out there. Will probably condense this for next pass. I may even change it to count the mailer used by each poster once only so we see how many people use a particular mailer not how much email was sent using a particular mailer. Most likely they did not have the mailer-id header as you mentioned. Either that or a horrible bug in my code. :) > >Message Content Types > > > > 9033 text/plain > > 941 multipart/mixed > > 625 multipart/signed > > 610 application/pgp-signature > > 258 text/html > > 238 multipart/alternative > > Similar question: 8100 messages, but here we have over 11,000 content > types? Just curious, really. > This one was interesting. I have found messages with multiple parts of similar types in the same message. In this case I did lowercase and strip things down on these headers to lump everything that looked like text/plain, etc together. The initial pass had a much longer list but I did not think it provided any additional information. > Good job, interesting stats. > Thanks. Something to do between other projects. -- Scot L. Harris webid@xxxxxxxxxx Never pay a compliment as if expecting a receipt.
