On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 15:54 +0530, Parameshwara Bhat wrote: > Hi Michael, Not Michael, but will through in my $0.02 anyway... ;^) > Thank you. You rightly guessed the source as fedora2. I presumed as > Synaptic/apt handle all dependencies, it would 'intelligently' handle > these inner requirements of a package. Not across major OS rev levels, particularly with different kernel series and glibc. > I downloaded k3b fedora1 version from http://download.fedora.us , also put > it on synaptic sources.list. Now k3b is working great. > > I am thinking I can upgrade FC1 in parts I want most from latest in FC2. > By the example, it looks not possible. Not recommended without rebuilding from source. > Now I have downloaded FC2 kernel > source-2.4.22-1.2194. Thats an FC1 kernel and not the latest. > I wanted to build it part for fun, partly because my > existing kernel source is somewhere a bit broken.(2.4.22-1.2115.nptl). Might want to try a later pre-built one for FC1, or later sources, say from http://atrpms.net/dist/fc1/kernel/ > My system is working fine. Do you think I can safely go ahead ? Depends on what other FC2 packages you may have loaded on FC1. If you really want 2.6 kernels/packages just jump into FC2. Phil
