This maybe trivial, but try http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html > -----Original Message----- > From: Gregory Gulik [mailto:greg@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:27 PM > To: For users of Fedora Core releases > Subject: Re: VERY slow NFS FC2 -> RH9 > > > > Ah, good point, but upon checking: > > Client: > eth0: VIA VT6102 Rhine-II at 0xe8800000, 00:0c:6e:ec:87:0f, IRQ 10. > eth0: MII PHY found at address 1, status 0x786d advertising > 01e1 Link 41e1. > eth0: Setting full-duplex based on MII #1 link partner > capability of 41e1. > > Server: > eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection > e1000: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex > > I checked both switches and those links are both being indicated as > full-duplex. > > > Here's another data point. I used scp to copy the same 11MB > file that > that took 1.7 seconds. That's really pointing at an NFS > problem rather > than a network problem. > > > Yang Xiao wrote: > > Hi, > > Are you sure they are all running at 100/FULL? Try set both > interfaces > > to 100/FULL instead of AUTO. Yang > > > -- > Greg Gulik http://www.gulik.org/greg/ > greg @ gulik.org > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
