Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
• From: Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@xxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:49:07 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:18, Giandomenico De Tullio wrote:
> On 29/06/2004 00:37:47, Ow Mun Heng wrote:
> > Guys,
> 
> > Kernel is Preempt too, io anticipatory.
> >
> 
> FC2 kernels are _NOT_ preemptive ...
> 
> grep -rn CONFIG_PREEMPT /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/.config
grep -rn CONFIG_PREEMP /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/.config
99:CONFIG_PREEMPT=y

This is on 2.6.7-mm2 Custom Kernel.
Even on the FC2 default kernel, it's still slower.

-- 

• References:
  • FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
    • From: Ow Mun Heng
  • Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
    • From: Giandomenico De Tullio

• Prev by Date: Re: OT What would be the best script type
• Next by Date: Re: [FC1-64] Problem with shared libs
• Previous by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
• Next by thread: problem with the panel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread