Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
From: Giandomenico De Tullio <ghisha@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:18:15 +0200
In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (from [email protected] on mar, giu 29, 2004 at 00:37:47 +0200)
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On 29/06/2004 00:37:47, Ow Mun Heng wrote:

Guys,

Kernel is Preempt too, io anticipatory.


FC2 kernels are _NOT_ preemptive ...

grep -rn CONFIG_PREEMPT /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/.config

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
  - From: Ow Mun Heng

References:
- FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
  - From: Ow Mun Heng

Prev by Date: Re: Dynamic Traffic Limiting
Next by Date: 2.6 modules search path
Previous by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
Next by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux