Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
• From: Giandomenico De Tullio <ghisha@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:18:15 +0200
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]> (from [email protected] on mar, giu 29, 2004 at 00:37:47 +0200)
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

FC2 kernels are _NOT_ preemptive ...

grep -rn CONFIG_PREEMPT /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/.config

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
    • From: Ow Mun Heng

• References:
  • FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
    • From: Ow Mun Heng

• Prev by Date: Re: Dynamic Traffic Limiting
• Next by Date: 2.6 modules search path
• Previous by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
• Next by thread: Re: FC2 responsiveness Slower compared to RH9 on 2.6 kernel
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread