Mike Fedyk said: [snip] > (and since it's just receiving the header portion of the rpm, it isn't > compressed) Yes they are. [snip] > 3. you don't need to create the indexes for yum that apt requires on > the server side Yes you do. [snip] > What do we end up with in the end? A lot of development spent on yum to > put what's already in apt in yum, and with competing index formats. Which is why effort is being put into the common metadata format. > Apt has repository priorities, and AFAICT, yum does not. Yes it does. > So "Will apt be in FC3"? I doubt it. It's in Fedora Extras, so who cares. -- William Hooper