I had to do the same thing in FreeBSD to make it install correctly - configure the geometry to show 16,383 - and that did the trick. I can't find where to do that in Fedora.
From: "Mark Lanett" <mlanett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Boot Issues with FC2
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:43:48 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from hormel.redhat.com ([209.132.177.30]) by mc5-f40.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:44:33 -0700
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.110])by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid 78F8773C96; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:44:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com[172.16.52.254])by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP idi5N0i3Nv009208 for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:44:03 -0400
Received: (from mail@localhost)by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i5N0i3913486for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:44:03 -0400
Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32])by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5N0i3013482for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:44:03 -0400
Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56])by mx3.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5N0huXn029207for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:43:56 -0400
Received: from WINGSPAN (adsl-66-124-253-198.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net[66.124.253.198])by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5N0gLdH011516for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Message-Info: yilqo4+6kc4wwrPbupRFv66g7a4J8/RT
Message-ID: <00ba01c458bb$29857fc0$3001a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <BAY15-F10BvuZHTWGPy001064c0@xxxxxxxxxxx>
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 1.052 *
X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archives/fedora-list>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
Return-Path: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jun 2004 00:44:34.0002 (UTC) FILETIME=[40A6D320:01C458BB]
I would be careful when deciding what the "true" CHS values are. 16384
sounds like a translated cylinder count - it's too neat. You should probably
google "chs translation" to understand the different CHS tuples; also look
at the physical hard drive, which probably has LBA CHS values printed on it
rather than BIOS-translated ones.
~mark
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lonnie Santella" <lonniesantella@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 5:32 PM Subject: Re: Boot Issues with FC2
> Okay - so I have something to start with - thank you very much. Fdisk
> displayed 38792 cylinders, when it should be 16,383 cylinders. Now my next
> problem is: where do I declare that with Fedora? When I choose to manual
> configure disk with Disk Druid - there's now place to edit the CHS values.
> How do I accomplish this?
>
>
> >From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: Boot Issues with FC2
> >Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:23:35 -0500
> >MIME-Version: 1.0
> >Received: from mc10-f20.hotmail.com ([65.54.166.156]) by
> >mc10-s13.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 22 Jun
> >2004 15:01:35 -0700
> >Received: from hormel.redhat.com ([209.132.177.30]) by
mc10-f20.hotmail.com
> >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:01:34 -0700
> >Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com
> >[10.8.4.110])by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPid DC0E073D43; Tue,
> >22 Jun 2004 18:01:32 -0400 (EDT)
> >Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
> >(int-mx1.corp.redhat.com[172.16.52.254])by listman.util.phx.redhat.com
> >(8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP idi5MM1NNv030325 for
> ><fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:01:23 -0400
> >Received: (from mail@localhost)by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6)
> >id i5MM1Nj32057for fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;Tue, 22 Jun
2004
> >18:01:23 -0400
> >Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31])by
> >int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i5MM1M032044for
> ><fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:01:22 -0400
> >Received: from mxsf14.cluster1.charter.net
> >(mxsf14.cluster1.charter.net[209.225.28.214])by mx1.redhat.com
> >(8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MM1Me1018293for
<fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> >Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:01:22 -0400
> >Received: from mxip02.cluster1.charter.net
> >(mxip02a.cluster1.charter.net[209.225.28.132])by
> >mxsf14.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP
> >idi5MLQgk7037820for <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:26:42
> >-0400 (EDT)
> >Received: from 66.169.139.149.ts46v-08.otnc2.ftwrth.tx.charter.com
> >(HELOcharter.net) (66.169.139.149)by mxip02.cluster1.charter.net with
> >ESMTP; 22 Jun 2004 17:26:42 -0400
> >X-Message-Info: 0jbW5ANosZJp1Xl95QR7K4QhZ+NyRn+I
> >Message-ID: <40D8A357.1010800@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1)
> >Gecko/20030225
> >X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
> >References: <BAY15-F5Oc4eGmSZ1Jr00057390@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >In-Reply-To: <BAY15-F5Oc4eGmSZ1Jr00057390@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >X-RedHat-Spam-Score: 0.969 X-loop: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >X-BeenThere: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
> >Precedence: junk
> >List-Id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
> >List-Unsubscribe:
>
><http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-re
quest@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>
> >List-Archive: </archives/fedora-list>
> >List-Post: <mailto:fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >List-Help: <mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
> >List-Subscribe:
>
><http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>,<mailto:fedora-list-re
quest@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
> >Errors-To: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Return-Path: fedora-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
> >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2004 22:01:35.0093 (UTC)
> >FILETIME=[7BF7BA50:01C458A4]
> >
> >
> >
> >Lonnie Santella wrote:
> >
> >>Can someone please take a shot at this? seems like a fundamental
problem,
> >>but I've exhausted all my resources. All support docs seem to suggest
the
> >>same thing, which doesn't work: directories relative to /boot.
> >>
> >>Bottom line is, Red Hat 9.0 installs fine on same machine - but FC2
always
> >>produces the same problem (below).
> >>
> >>Here?s a quick review of my environment:
> >>
> >>(1) Always a COMPLETELY clean install ? using Drive Image utility to
erase
> >>all partitions and restore MBR.
> >>
> >>(2) Two machines, both Asus P4 clones with 1 GB RAM, and 1 Western
Digital
> >>20 GB hard drive each.
> >>
> >>(3) Both machines have subsequently loaded Redhat 9.0 and ran flawlessly
?
> >>no problems at all.
> >>
> >>(4) I have two different ISO image CD?s from two different mirrors ?
both
> >>with verified MD5Sum?s and both producing the exact same problem each
> >>time.
> >>
> >>So I?ve been trying to install FC2 ? I?ve just finished my 11th attempt.
> >>Following the advice of different threads and release notes, I always go
> >>back to a fresh install before trying anything new.
> >>
> >>To minimize variables, I keep the install as simple as possible. I
choose
> >>?Automatic Partition?, which creates a 100MB /boot on hda1, a 17GB ?/?
> >>(root) on hda2, and a 2GB swap on hda3. I also choose a ?minimal?
install
> >>to eliminate possible variables from the other CD?s ? this way I only
have
> >>to use CD1.
> >
> >Try doing a manual partition. Also verify that the bios is set to lba
for
> >these drives and that fdisk shows the correct lba CHS parameters for the
> >drives.
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Each time, the install itself is flawless. But after the first reboot ?
> >>and naturally each time thereafter, immediately following the POST, I
get
> >>a black screen with the word ?GRUB? in the upper left corner. No
response
> >>to keyboard strokes or mouse movement at that point.
> >>
> >>I have to rule out hardware ? since this problem with FC2, I have
> >>successfully installed and ran RedHat 9.0 and FreeBSD 4.10. I always use
a
> >>tried and true utility to erase the hard drives of all partitions and
> >>restore MBR before installing anything new. This guarantees a pristine
> >>physical drive during the install.
> >>
> >>I compared the grub.conf files on each machine after the FC2 install.
They
> >>are identical. No big surprise there I guess. Then, just for further
> >>comparison, I isolated one machine and wiped it clean, and loaded RedHat
> >>9.0. Then I compared it?s grub.conf to that of the FC2 install. Almost
> >>identical except for the ?/? (root) and swap partitions. In each case
the
> >>/boot partition is always the first (hda1). In FC2, the ?/? root
partition
> >>is the second one (hda2) followed but the swap on hda3. But in RedHat
9.0,
> >>the swap is on hda2, followed by the / root on hda3. No big deal there,
> >>the grub.conf files compensate for this but looking to hda2 on FC2 and
> >>hda3 on RedHat 9.0 as one would expect.
> >>
> >>Both grub.conf files from FC2 and RedHat 9.0 list an entry as follows:
> >>
> >>Root (hd0,0)
> >>
> >>? I?m not sure if having different root partitions should affect this or
> >>not, but it?s the same in both OS?s.
> >>
> >>One other thing I thought was odd is that on both machines, the standard
> >>FC2 install puts a strange format or partition table on the physical
> >>drive; so much so that it takes a few extreme steps to wipe the
partition
> >>info off the drive. Normally I would just use the ?delete? function of
the
> >>utility, which works for all the RedHat dirstros and FreeBSD ? but in
FC2
> >>it generates and error stating that it can?t delete the partition. I
have
> >>to use a utility called ?bigfdisk? then put a dos partition on it, then
> >>delete the dos partition ? to get everything set back to a completely
> >>empty hard drive.
> >
> >This is the clue that you may need to check the CHS values and do a
manual
> >partiton
> >
> >I suspect you are seeing the bug related to some mobo/bios and the lba
> >parameters with the 2.6 kernel and partitoning.
> >
> >My MSI mobo had this problem and after I manually set the CHS parameters
on
> >the disk it worked perfectly.
> >
> >I thought I had the link to the fix for this bookmarked but I can't find
it
> >right now.
> >
> >Maybe someone can repost the link here.
> >
> >>
> >>I?d really like to give FC2 a test run ? been looking forward to it.
I?ve
> >>read the release notes, and browsed for two solid days through news
> >>threads and docs. I?m stuck, could you please help me out here?
> >>
> >>Thanks in advance,
> >>
> >>Lonnie
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >fedora-list mailing list
> >fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
