Am Fr, den 18.06.2004 schrieb Julian Underwood um 3:32:
> Installed via Synaptic which removed vsftpd in the process. Should I
That does not explain where it does come from!
rpm -qa --qf "%{packager} - %{name} %{version} - %{arch}\n" | grep
proftpd
to get who the packager is.
> compile from source? If so, I'd imagine it would be wise to remove the
> rpm first, or does that not matter? If you can make sense from the
> output from ldd /usr/bin/ftpwho, then you are wile-e-coyote,
> super-genius:
As said, I use the proftpd package by freshrpms.net and it is compiled
against ncurses.
> [julian@shuttle julian]$ ldd /usr/bin/ftpwho
> linux-gate.so.1 => (0x0046a000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x005b8000)
> /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0059b000)
Well, your ftpwho - part of proftpd - is not compiled against ncurses.
> Julian
Get a proper proftpd RPM and you don't need to compile it yourself.
Alexander
--
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13
Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.6-1.435
Serendipity 16:00:45 up 3 days, 12:27, load average: 0.42, 0.23, 0.09
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
