However, if hardware vendors sought excess sales they would streamline collaboration with any successful software development team. Thus, creating a greater educated and greater talented developer base which in turn supports an industry of Computing Interests and not geared towards Capitalist attraction. (There is more than just one type of CRASH with IT).
Returns can be outside of monetry value in IT.
From: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx CC: bradford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: FC2 Issues Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:44:04 -0400
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:12:26 -0400 bradford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Sean Estabrooks wrote:
> > the Asus mobo issue didn't affect 99.99% of people.
>
> Asus' is reported to have about a 20% share of mb sales (http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/mainboards/display/20031106150631.html), and this "issue" affected more than one of their most popular boards, so your statistic is highly suspect.
>
> Maybe you mean that this problem didn't affect 99.99% of Sean Estabrooks, give or take .01%
Dunno... picked a number.. it's a small percentage of people who were affected.
Why should everyone wait for a release just because there are outstanding
problems with one mobo? Perhaps if Asus worked with the open source community
and the Linux kernel developers to a greater extent this problem wouldn't have
happened. Don't hear enough people putting preasure on these hardware vendors.
Instead they blame the open source developers. Very strange.
Cheers, Sean
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
_________________________________________________________________
SEEK: Now with over 50,000 dream jobs! Click here: http://ninemsn.seek.com.au?hotmail
