-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 08 June 2004 16:50, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 15:27:51 +0100, Andy Green <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > and was depressed to find > > that the latest SuSE is 2.6 and not exhibiting the kinds of problems we > > see in FC2 > > I would like to know how you know people using the latest suse are not > seeing similar problems. "SuSE users beat me over the head with it" is the best I can offer. And the fact that SuSE users won't be seeing the problems with the FC2 install/installed kernel that came from the RH-specific kernel patches. > Can you point be to a public bugzilla that Suse > uses that catelogs reported problems that I can search. I'd love to make a > comparison for myself, but I can't seem to find a public > bugzilla. Nope. They seem to have paid support, read-only knowledgebase and a ml. Sort of like MSFT. I glance at their ml archives and I see this: http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2004-Jun/0022.html ''Curious. I returned my copy after all the problems I was having with filesystem corruption. I'm still not happy with the solution (returning to Fedora), but I have to run SOMETHING. Has anyone figured out a single point of failure as to why so many people such as myself are having random problems with SuSE 9.1? I'd like to give it a go, but not in its current state'' (Off to beat that over some SuSE users' heads) - -Andy - -- Automatic actions for USB cameras, cardreaders, memory sticks, MP3 players http://warmcat.com/usbautocam -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAxecAjKeDCxMJCTIRAuwOAJ4/rzElvQ6GvejUW4hAjHAYOntrngCgiWd0 lpW784LoEUBaaAbq/eFtmLg= =rR0N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
