Can anyone tell me how to enable rlogin and use Xserver remotely? -----Original Message----- From: fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 8:07 PM To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 4, Issue 120 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Netiquette Primer, please read! (was: Re: European law) (Rodolfo J. Paiz) 2. Re: repost/wishlist item: FC2 libata/system response with busy disk (Marc Lucke) 3. Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*) (Tristan Fillmore) 4. Re: Trash folder problem (Jeff Ratliff) 5. Re: Sharing printers with cups: what is wrong? (John L. Pierce) 6. Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]r (T. 'Nifty New Hat' Mitchell) 7. Re: sendmail imap mailbox location (Alexander Dalloz) 8. Re: FC2 Game Wish List (Bruno Wolff III) 9. Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]r (Sean Estabrooks) 10. Re: burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP (Mike Dixon) 11. hd spindown prevents reboot (klaus thorn) 12. [Critique me!] READ THIS NOW: WINXP DUAL BOOT/ASUS P4P plus useful links, too! (melgil88) 13. imap on fC2 missing (Nina Pham) 14. no dri with dual head (lihb) 15. Re: hd spindown prevents reboot (Sean Estabrooks) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 16:40:26 -0600 From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Netiquette Primer, please read! (was: Re: European law) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <6.1.1.1.0.20040607163940.02766d08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 13:48 6/7/2004, Beartooth wrote: >Very! If you will permit, I at least (whose name for the purpose ought to >be legion, and may really be) will forward your whole (unsnipped) to my >own machine, put it in a boilerplate file, and pass it around whenever the >occasion arises, as it does only too often. > >[...] > >If I presume aright, you'd likely prefer that your name but not your >indicia remain with it, lest some luser forward it to a spammer. OK by >you? Quite flattered, and yes... entirely OK by me. -- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.simpaticus.com ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:43:13 +1000 From: Marc Lucke <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: repost/wishlist item: FC2 libata/system response with busy disk To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <40C4EF81.2010101@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" My CPU is not overworked so renicing doesn't help. I'm sure it is a libata thing. Under my self compiled kernels > 2.4.24 my sata disk came up as hde and I could tune it using hdparm (not that that really made a difference over auto-configured values anyway) but as hde my system did not have quite such serious slowdowns. It seems to me that there are 2 development tracks for sata - ata & scsi emulation (the latter libata). The latter doesn't work very well on my system. Hey, but the FC2 test kernel 2.6.6 actually booted my system unaided for the first time for any FC kernel. Perfomance still hasn't improved, though, but I'm just happy it is now working at all. Unlike some on this list that I get way too annoyed with, I'm running on the leading edge of not only Redhat's efforts, but in many ways Linux itself so I'm happy to put up with some of these things and wait until a bright spark can fix the problem. The only thing I can give back is to report my problems. I'm not entirely sure, but hdparm for ATA devices gives an option to unmask the irq. To my knowledge this allows the system to handle things even if the hard disk is ultra busy. Perhaps it may have something to do with acpi - i.e. the way the kernel handles hardware interrupts? Chadley Wilson wrote: >On Mon, 2004-06-07 at 09:02, Marc Lucke wrote: > > >>I have posted this before and gotten precisely nowhere. So I thought I >>would put it back up and also put it out there that a fix in the next >>kernel update would make me very happy. >> >>The problem: when my disk is very busy - like when using dvdauthor - my >>computer stops responding to everything else. >>Relevant Hardware: Gigabyte 8IPE1000Pro2 m/b + SATA disk (ICH5, 865PE) >>History: >>(0) had FC1 running with self-compiled > 2.4.24 kernels and the system >>saw my SATA disk as hde >>(1) system booted from FC2 CD just as it did for the FC1 by loading >>ata_piix (& necessary dependencies) >>(2) system would not boot from installed kernel >>(3) thanks to the Fedora IRC channel I found out how to modify the >>initrd to get my system to load ata_piix >>(4) system now uses libata and sees my SATA disk as sda >>(5) with my hdd recognised as hde (see note 0) has hde my system would >>respond to smtp & web requests a bit more slowly, but it still worked. >>As sda it will actually timeout connections to port 25 under load >>(6) posted all sorts of requests to this list but I think step 3 is >>beyond most on this list, let alone this problem >> >>I'm not complaining. Just if someone exists that knows above can >>respond or else it can it be added to some developer's wishlist? I'd >>love to get FC2 working like I had FC1 working with kernels greater than >>2.4.24 >> >> >>Marc >> >> >I had same problem with mencoder. > >Why don't you renice dvdauthor to a lower priority so that your mouse >and other bits of the OS can still function? >It worked beautifully. :-) >I used >renice 5 -p 3203 (3203 being the PID for mecoder at the time) > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040608/a3e1fff0/attachment.htm ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 15:43:02 -0700 From: Tristan Fillmore <tfillmore@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: problem with cdrecord / Fedora Core 2 (/dev/sg*) To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1086648181.30755.10.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain On Tue, 2004-06-01 at 13:58, weha wrote: > Fedora Core 2 also recognizes it at /dev/scd0 (CD-reading works fine). > But cdrecord, only regognizes my ATAPI-CDROM, which isn't a CD-Writer: SCSI support in the cdrecord shipped with Core 2 seems to be somewhat broken. I am able to burn by using "cdrecord dev=/dev/scd0" (instead of specifying a SCSI bus location). This produces a warning, but it seems to work. Tristan ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:48:54 -0400 From: Jeff Ratliff <jefrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Trash folder problem To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040607214854.GA10843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 06:46:37AM -0700, Mac wrote: > I got myself into another fine mess. > > I copied a fat32 media folder to my desktop but I > found out when I update that folder in Windows it > doesn't update that desktop folder {my > shortsightedness}. I deleted the desktop folder and > put into the 'trash' folder. I am unable to empty the > trash totally (only a folder with .jpeg's now exits) > because I don't have 'persmission'. > I did a similar thing -- tried to make a shortcut to a folder on a FAT32 partition, and copied it instead. You can just right click on the file and click properties. On the permissions tab, make sure you have write permission (give everybody write permission if you want, it doesn't matter), and then you can delete it. It takes a while if you did it on a lot of files, but it's less scary than deleting things as root if you're not used to doing things at a command line. ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:01:27 -0500 From: "John L. Pierce" <bjjp@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Sharing printers with cups: what is wrong? To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <200406071801.28278.bjjp@xxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I just allow all hosts on the subnet, and I have used CIDR x.x.x.x/y. My router keeps the internet out. John ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:03:18 -0700 From: "T. 'Nifty New Hat' Mitchell" <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]r To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040607230317.GA17938@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 03:09:15PM -0400, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > "T. 'Nifty New Hat' Mitchell" <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Consider the mmx class of instructions that Intel introduced. > > What "C" code causes these instructions to be generated by gcc. > > > > See ..../arch/i386/lib/mmx.c .... > > One of the problems with complex instruction set processors (GFX > > engines are complex) is that compiler writers often ignore the full > > instruction set.... ... > > > > These are not frame buffers with 'common' processors glued to them. > > > > What are you talking about? Do you know how many open > source 3D drivers there are? Please check out: > > http://dri.sourceforge.net/ Good pointer. Looking at the design documents I see mention of what I am saying. These are not simple frame buffers with common processors glued to them. The design of dri shows awareness of this task and associated issues. What I am failing to communicate is that there is a fun set of issues associated with the use of asymmetric special purpose co-processor subsystems for acceleration of any type. Of interest dri does work on FC2 (nv driver) with my nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] card, glxgears and more. Just not as fast as the accelerated driver. -- T o m M i t c h e l l /dev/null the ultimate in secure storage. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 01:04:00 +0200 From: Alexander Dalloz <alexander.dalloz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: sendmail imap mailbox location To: nina@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <1086649440.23431.412.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Di, den 08.06.2004 schrieb Nina Pham um 0:27: > sorry, didn't mean to send directly mail to you. I just press reply and > didn't notice that the mail reciepient is just your address. Anyway, I That might just be the case because you set your own mail address as reply address besides the list mail address. If you don't want double mails or at least receiving the mail directly, then please reconfigure your mail client and do not set a reply to address explicitly. > need help to recompile procmail. I want to do this for every mailbox. So > is there a way to do it just once, and do not need to do procmail for > every user home directory? And let say, if I run procmail from root and > try to set the mailbox folder for all usermailboxes, do I need to do it > again if I restart the system? I don't want to do it again. > > Nina Sorry, rethinking about it, Procmail would be not the problem, as you can set by a global /etc/procmailrc or individual ~/.procmailrc user files where and how the mail shall be stored (as long as the permissions are fitting). The problem would be the IMAP server: it has to know where the INBOX is to find. If you really would store the mail in a non standard path, then you have to tell the IMAP server where that is. Unfortunately you did not say which IMAP server you are using. If it is the uw-imap, then you certainly have to recompile it. Take the src.rpm package and modify the source. Certainly better would be to change, to use dovecot and configure it in the /etc/dovecot.conf. Set the default_mail_env like you want it, i.e. default_mail_env = maildir:/imapMail/%umaildir to use the directory you spoke about in your first mail. Be sure you let Procmail to deliver to the maildir too: MAILDIR=/imapMail/$usermaildir Be aware that uw-imap uses mbox and not maildir by default, unless you change it during compilation time. Please don't blame me if you loose mail! And would you please be so kind to explain why you need such a non standard setup? What do you mean by "each user can access to his own mailbox"? Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon CPU kernel 2.6.5-1.358 Serendipity 00:34:34 up 6 days, 52 users, load average: 0.15, 0.10, -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil Url : /archives/fedora-list/attachments/20040608/7eb57706/attachment.bin ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:14:20 -0500 From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: FC2 Game Wish List To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <20040607231420.GA14172@xxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 18:36:18 -0400, Jeff Ratliff <jefrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Pits of Angband is pretty good, and available as source. Check it > out at <http://www.thangorodrim.net/>. If you've not played it, > it's a rogue-like dungeon adventure. I've been playing it over a > year and still haven't beaten it. I still want to play Rogue 3.6 again. The 3.6 clones I have found are missing some things (e.g. party rooms, confused moves into walls not counting as a move) and I don't have the same foundness for the 5.3 monsters even though many of them were in 3.6 under different names. ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:15:18 -0400 From: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: feedback to NVidia [was: Nvidia Drivers]r To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20040607191518.0012331c.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 16:03:18 -0700 "T. 'Nifty New Hat' Mitchell" <mitch48@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > These are not frame buffers with 'common' processors glued to them. > > > > > What are you talking about? Do you know how many open > > source 3D drivers there are? Please check out: > > > > http://dri.sourceforge.net/ > > Good pointer. > > Looking at the design documents I see mention of what I am saying. > These are not simple frame buffers with common processors > glued to them. The design of dri shows awareness of this task > and associated issues. > > What I am failing to communicate is that there is a fun set of issues > associated with the use of asymmetric special purpose co-processor > subsystems for acceleration of any type. > > Of interest dri does work on FC2 (nv driver) with my nVidia > Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] card, glxgears and more. Just > not as fast as the accelerated driver. > That's just the development site for the 3D drivers that you typically get already included in the XFree/Xorg rpms. Nvidia cards do not have a DRI component as mentioned on the site. So you won't get any acceleration. There are quite a few cards that do have open source 3D acceleration drivers and they are listed on that site as well. Once the details of any given card is released there is some hope that a DRI driver will appear. All of the topics you touched on are handled by the developers there and they use the gnu compiler & assembler. Cheers, Sean ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:31:33 -0400 From: Mike Dixon <mdixon10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: burning install CDs from ISOs with Windows XP To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <40C4FAD5.9000303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed thanks to all - Steven Stern and Roger Sowerby in particular - for help with the CD burning issue - Roxio worked fine, but disks two and three were corrupted - which I didn't find out until the middle of the install process. Helps to follow directions and do a media check on all disks, which I neglected to do. I did run across the dreaded XP/FC2 dual boot problem - and tried a couple of solutions which I found at the weblogs.oreilly.com and lwn.net - neither of which worked for me, but then again I'm really new at this and didn't understand all the instructions. So, Windows wouldn't boot. I haven't seen this solution mentioned anywhere else, but it worked for me. I did a clean install of FC1 and voila! I do want to give FC2 a try - anyone have any recommendations re:installation which will work for a person who's really new to this? I also want to thank those who are welcoming to newbies on this list. I don't understand a lot of the technical mumbo-jumbo, but have seen a number of things come through which will be helpful, just in my one day on the list. Thanks again all- Mike ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:53:22 +0200 From: klaus thorn <klaus@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: hd spindown prevents reboot To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20040607235322.GD29344@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii When I reboot my Fedora Core 2 (AMD Duron), the harddisk (ExelStor G140, 40 GB) is spinned down. When the BIOS searches for hard disk a few seconds later the disk is not ready yet. The reboot fails, sometimes with awful klick sounds of the hard disk. So how do I turn off the spin down of hard drives during reboot? -- klaus thorn klaus@xxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 19:56:07 -0400 From: melgil88 <melgil88@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Critique me!] READ THIS NOW: WINXP DUAL BOOT/ASUS P4P plus useful links, too! To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <1086652567.2633.13.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain Ok folks, I've gotten all but .5 yea's from several of the users on this list, so here's the first test mail. Please let me know if everything in here looks ok, makes sense, is in the right order. I'm pretty much an Average Joe User, so holler if I've written something asinine or nonsensical. Let me know if I've missed anything, left anything out. Please note I'd like to leave this listing as short as possible, while still being informative. I figure I'll put the worst/most frequently asked-about problems in the subject title, so folks with those problems will know to look here first. If all like it, I'll keep posting it and make changes as the bug du jour changes. Let me know if anything should be added at any time! If people get sick of it/think it's not working or is no longer necessary, of course I'll stop posting it, simply give a holler. <!-- start --> Latest problems: ***WinXP Dual boot problems*** So you've installed Fedora Core 2 and now you can't boot into Windows XP...STOP RIGHT THERE! Quit playing with that partition table. Go here for the fix: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-May/msg00908.html _______________________________________ ***Asus P4P800 Series motherboard*** Got one and tried to install Fedora Core 2? Won't install, right? Go here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121819 ______________________________________ For other problem fixes/information, please go to the Unofficial FAQ. Trust me, the answer is probably there. If it's not, there will most likely be a link to it: http://www.fedorafaq.org/ ______________________________________ Check Bugzilla, try the "most frequently reported bugs" listing first: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/duplicates.cgi ______________________________________ Here's the link to the Archive for this list: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/ You can try the search feature at the top of that page, but it's been known to be flaky at times. ______________________________________ Try Google: http://www.google.com/ Slap a string in there with your error message (or part of it) and see if anyone else has had the problem. ______________________________________ If you can't find an answer to your problem with any of those steps above, post here at fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxxx But BEFORE YOU DO THAT- the folks here can help you much better if you include the following information: -A descriptive subject title. This will spare folks who don't have advice from spending the time reading your note, and will single out those who do. It will also be a great help to those who come after you with the same problem. -Hardware specs of your machine: motherboard, CPU, video card, ethernet card, etc... -Software info: Kernel version, Window manager. -Error messages. -Steps you took that got you to this error. ________________________________________ General non-problem stuff: Got window manager questions? Want to know how to do something in your chosen window manager? If you're using Gnome, go here: http://www.gnome.org/learn/ Mailing lists: http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ If you're using KDE, go here: http://www.kde.org/documentation/ Mailing lists: http://www.kde.org/mailinglists/ ________________________________________ Finally, here's the link to *all* Redhat mailing lists: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ ________________________________________ ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:01:34 -0700 From: Nina Pham <nina@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: imap on fC2 missing To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID: <40C501DE.3020904@xxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed I had FC1 installed and had no problem with imap, and pop3. I recently install FC2, and when I did chkconfig --list, I don't see either imap or pop3. Did I miss anything here? Nina ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:01:46 +0800 From: lihb <lihb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: no dri with dual head To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <40C501EA.8070508@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I have a dell d600, with ati radeon 9000, I setup dual head with the following xorg.conf: ####################################################### # Xorg configuration created by system-config-display Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "Multihead layout" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 Screen 1 "Screen1" RightOf "Screen0" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" Option "Xinerama" "off" Option "Clone" "on" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" FontPath "unix/:7100" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "extmod" Load "fbdevhw" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "freetype" Load "type1" Load "dri" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Dell 1400x1050 Laptop Display Panel" HorizSync 31.5 - 90.0 VertRefresh 59.0 - 75.0 Option "dpms" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor1" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor 1024x768" HorizSync 31.5 - 57.0 VertRefresh 50.0 - 70.0 Option "dpms" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Videocard0" Driver "radeon" VendorName "Videocard vendor" BoardName "ATI Radeon Mobility M9" Option "AGPMode" "4" Option "EnablePageFlip" "true" Option "MonitorLayout" "LVDS, TMDS" Option "backingstore" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Screen 0 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Videocard1" Driver "radeon" VendorName "Videocard Vendor" BoardName "ATI Radeon Mobility M9" Option "AGPMode" "4" Option "EnablePageFlip" "true" Option "MonitorLayout" "LVDS, TMDS" Option "backingstore" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" Screen 1 EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Videocard0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 Modes "1400x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 Modes "1400x1050" "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600" "640x480" EndSubSection EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen1" Device "Videocard1" Monitor "Monitor1" DefaultDepth 16 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 Modes "1024x768" EndSubSection EndSection Section "DRI" Group 0 Mode 0666 EndSection ############################################################################ I found that the dri had been disable, even though I have Option "AGPMode" "4", is there anywhere I could solve this problem? Or what should I check to clarified this problem? AND, also I had try to use ATI fglrx driver, which have dri on dual-head mode, but the output of 2nd-screen is a totaly mess, any icons, any details on the 2nd-screen are unreadable, and when the mouse move on 2nd-screen, I just see a bunch of color pixels moving. The xorg.conf is configured by fglrxconfig. Clone-mode on both driver do have dri, but too bad, I don't know how to let 1st-screen with 1400x1050 while 2nd-screen at 1024x768. Thanks to any comment. lihb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 20:07:02 -0400 From: Sean Estabrooks <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: hd spindown prevents reboot To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <20040607200702.0e0cba42.seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 01:53:22 +0200 klaus thorn <klaus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > When I reboot my Fedora Core 2 (AMD Duron), the harddisk (ExelStor G140, 40 GB) is spinned down. When the BIOS searches for hard disk a few seconds later the disk is not ready yet. The reboot fails, sometimes with awful klick sounds of the hard disk. > > So how do I turn off the spin down of hard drives during reboot? This issue is fixed in newer kernels. An official upgrade kernel for FC2 will be released at some point. If you can't wait you can either build your own kernel or grab the test kernel rpm supplied by Arjan at: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.6/RPMS.kernel/ Good luck, Sean ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 4, Issue 120 *******************************************
