On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 14:50, Dylan Parry wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jun 2004 17:59:59 -0400, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook > <jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Some would probably consider pine and mc to be obsolete, but I have yet > > to find any acceptable substitute for either of them. (I know that pine's > > licensing precludes it from being included in the core distribution, I > > use it only as an example good software that may not fit with the cutting > > edge view of what to use...) > > Indeed. I very much miss the ability to use Pico out of the box. I > normally use it in preference over VI when I make a bugger up editing > xorg.conf or similar ;) Have you tried nano? It's a pico clone with an open license. If you can't get used to the name, use a symlink. :) -- Chris Kloiber
