Re: FC1 stable, FC2 ... you wish.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 10:53:35PM -0300, Patrick Boutilier wrote:
> 
> 
> Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> >
> >   Okay, so after a whole week of fighting FC2 to run, and having to 
> >reboot the machine every 4 to 5 hours because of a kernel panic, I 
> >downgraded to FC1 and low and behold...the server's running without a 
> >single hitch.  So, something's screwed with FC2 which causes it to panic 
> >with either the pdflush or the swapper processes, whereas none of the 
> >previous RH versions, nor FC1 have that problem.  It also trashed a 200 
> >GB drive every time it panicked.  None of the previous versions of RH 
> >did that.
> >
> >   And with everything else I have read on this list over the past two 
> >weeks or so, I'd say stay away from FC2.  Maybe it's time I start 
> >looking at a different distribution...
> 
> Do as you please but I haven't had a single problem with FC2 .
> 
It is also true with every distribution there are hardware
configurations they will not work on. It is a mystery.
-- 
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
One Trinity Place.
San Antonio, TX 78212-7200

telephone: (210)-999-7484
email:akonstam@xxxxxxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux