On Sun, 6 Jun 2004 16:58:50 +0100 Paul Duffy <odubtaig@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 17:00, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > > Because you insist on using proprietary, encumbered technologies that > > would make RedHat vulnerable to legal action if they distributed them. > > As they do in the kernel source they provide. > > Now, if you can adopt a less patronising attitude (as some of us don't really > have an option when it comes to not installing Windows and it doesn't always > let you format for FAT32 on install) and tell me how including it in the > kernel source but not the kernel makes a legal difference that would be much > appreciated. > > regards, Paul Sorry you'll have to consult a lawyer I have no idea. Also you could ask Microsoft why you have to install extra software to access Linux partition from Windows. Cheers, Sean
