On Sunday 06 Jun 2004 17:00, Sean Estabrooks wrote: > Because you insist on using proprietary, encumbered technologies that > would make RedHat vulnerable to legal action if they distributed them. As they do in the kernel source they provide. Now, if you can adopt a less patronising attitude (as some of us don't really have an option when it comes to not installing Windows and it doesn't always let you format for FAT32 on install) and tell me how including it in the kernel source but not the kernel makes a legal difference that would be much appreciated. regards, Paul
