Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
From: Gerry Tool <gstool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:28:02 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510

Gerry Tool wrote:

Thanks. That got me a long ways. However, when I try to install xffm and xffm-icons, I get the following dependency:
[root@gstpc rpms]# rpm -Uvh xffm*.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
        dbh >= 1.0 is needed by xffm-4.0.5-1
        libdbh-1.0.so.1 is needed by xffm-4.0.5-1
I haven't tried to find out what I need yet - any hint would be helpful.

doh! I installed dbh to solve this problem.

Gerry

References:
- Xfce and FC2
  - From: Nicu Buculei
- Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
  - From: Gerry Tool
- Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
  - From: Nicu Buculei
- Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
  - From: Gerry Tool

Prev by Date: Re: Is Fedora.us FC2 repository not yum-enabled?
Next by Date: Re: ntoskrnl.exe
Previous by thread: Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
Next by thread: Re: Xfce and FC2 (installs, but not fully functional?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]