Luc Bouchard wrote:
Sean Estabrooks said:
So, to the question of how to promote more open source adoption.You are forgetting one thing here Sean, economies of scale. Let's assume that NVIDIA
It seems to be well accepted that the market place _rules_ and every dollar
spent is a vote. Being simplistic then, the more "votes" that companies
get because they support open source (intel seems to be a pretty good actor
these days for example) the better. The fewer "votes" that companies
who don't support open source get (NVIDIA in this case) the better.
makes 1 million cards per year. Let's be generous and say that 5% of those cards end up
in Linux boxes (and I'm being VERY generous with that number). Then let's say that 50%
of those machines are run by people that are principled in thought and would only use
Open Source drivers. This means that NVIDIA engineers need to make a business case to
management and share holders to satisfy 25,000 clients out of 1 million. Most
management would say tough luck. They do provide Linux drivers and for them that is
enough, whether this is principled or not is irrelevant. Most business will not cater
to the common good, but only to the corporate wallet.
...snip...
If I remember correctly the reason the drivers are not open source was that some part of the graphics engine was designed by another company that has licensed the technology to nvidia and they will not allow nvidia to open source the drivers. I thought the same issue applied to ATI, so I was surprised to see 3D support for my Radeon 8500.
I thought there was talk about platform independent binary driver support for video cards a few years ago, and was part of SDL.
