On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 17:02 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > At 15:48 5/17/2004, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > >On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 15:03 -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > > > >Then it gives you no warranties, offers no responsability or liability > > > >for problems (imagine if in certain conditions you got a total > > > >filesystem corruption and lost something important...). > > > > > > Please, show me any application that *does* take responsibility or > > > liability for any of those things! > > > >No one does it on proprietary software, normally. And it is one possible > >source of revenue with Free Software. > > Still, you're complaining that NVIDIA does not do a thing which no one else > does either. I fail to see the relevance of that. I'm not complaining about this in particular, do not try to make it a small item. I stated a series of facts, which you now seem ready to discard for one point where you refuse to see the problem. It's not that it offers no warranties. It's that you can't even check or pay someone to check and give you liability. Rui
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
