On or about 2004-04-27 10:31, David Collantes whipped out a trusty #2 pencil and scribbled:However, it appears that the addition of the fedora-list signature which the mailing list software adds is doing something to confuse at least Mozilla 1.7b. I can see the:
I certainly hope not! For years I have made it a habit to sign all my email. In that way, if someone ever pops up and says I sent such-and-such an email, and it's NOT signed, I can argue that it was forged more likely than not. OR, if it's signed but doesn't verify, I can prove it's been modified. And the signed copy from my "Sent Mail" archives can prove exactly what I did send."Some user complained that my PGP messages are attachments!
That user is using obsolete and broken software. PGP/MIME is the only
way to use PGP with email that is actually specified (RFC 2015) and not
[...]
Good then, I assume no one will have a problem with S/MIME signed messages
either, right?
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
block in the message source, but Mozilla doesn't show it as signed. It shows it properly from my "Sent Mail" folder, however. I'm pretty sure this is just a bug with the beta Mozilla, however.
-- Fritz Whittington TI Alum - http://www.tialumni.org
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
