On Tuesday 27 April 2004 3:26 pm, jludwig wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 09:55, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 April 2004 2:38 pm, jludwig wrote: > > > On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 09:20, Gary Stainburn wrote: > > > > Hi folks. > > > > > > > > I've got an Advent 5372 laptop with what MS Windows detects as a 'SIS > > > > 900 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter'. > > > > > > > > When I had RH7.3 on the NIC was detected straight out of the box and > > > > worked fine. When I replaced this wic FC1 everything looked fine, > > > > with it finding the card okay and allowing me to configure it. > > > > > > > > However, there's absolutely no traffic happening with the card > > > > (booting to windows proves the card, cable etc work). > > > > > > > > my /etc/modules.conf has the line > > > > > > > > alias eth0 sis900 > > > > > > > > and lsmod includes sis900, sis and sisfb > > > > > > > > Any suggestions on how to fix it? > > > > -- > > > > Gary Stainburn > > > > > > > > This email does not contain private or confidential material as it > > > > may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown > > > > and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, > > > > 2000 > > > > > > What does route -n and ifconfig indicate? Can the card ping itself. I > > > have the same adapter in my firewall/gateway as eth0 (Ext IF) running > > > FC1. It upgraded without any issues from RH9.0. > > > > Below is the info you asked for. I can't see anything wrong (apart from > > it not working). > > The ping indicates that the card driver/card combination is functioning > and talking. N > > 1) Netmask looks good > 2) Route looks good > 3) What does mii-tool say? > 4) Does you network use a standard "class B" netmask? Yes, all of our addresses are 10. with the second octet being the site, and a class b subnet manages this. > 5) Try ping -b -c 3 10.2.0.0 to see if you can see anyone? See below > > I don't see any indications of the kernel version my kernel is > 2.4.22-1.2188.nptl on my GW/FW. > Again, see below. It's actually a clean install from the FC1 CD's with no updates applied yet (needs network working first). > > [root@localhost root]# ping 10.2.1.7 > PING 10.2.1.7 (10.2.1.7) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 10.2.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.357 ms > 64 bytes from 10.2.1.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.258 ms > > > jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx> [root@localhost root]# mii-tool eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-HD, link ok [root@localhost root]# ping -b -c 3 10.2.0.0 WARNING: pinging broadcast address PING 10.2.0.0 (10.2.0.0) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.2.1.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.263 ms 64 bytes from 10.2.1.7: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.259 ms 64 bytes from 10.2.1.7: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.228 ms --- 10.2.0.0 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.228/0.250/0.263/0.015 ms, pipe 2 [root@localhost root]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.22-1.2115.nptl #1 Wed Oct 29 15:42:51 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@localhost root]# [gary@gary gary]$ -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
