pine 4.58 compiles and runs real well on FC1 I had no problems with it just do a ./compile slx for generic linux install and poof........ pine in your box. On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Joe(theWordy)Philbrook wrote: > It would appear that on Apr 12, ne... did say: > > > On Apr 12, 2004 at 07:26, dante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in a soothing rage wrote: > > >1. Does anyone know why tripwire was dropped? Can the maintainers be > > >convinced to re-add it? (Is this some license issue? Time to write > > >some replacement?) > > Check the fedora-devel list archives. I believe there was some > > discussion of this there. I believe you will also find a tripwire > > rpm at fedora.us. Dag's repo also has a pine rpm. > > One word of caution here. I don't know from direct experience, but I've > heard from several sources that some of the packages from any of the > freshrpms repositories can conflict with some packages from fedora.us and > livna.org repositories. > > Dag is one of several freshrpm repositories. > > So If you decide to get pine from dag (works great BTW) I'd check all > the freshrpms repositories before installing tripwire from fedora.us. > > OR if I _was_ getting tripwire from fedora.us, I'd search it and > livna.org for pine. > > I've also heard that the pine source tarball does compile and run well > on FC1, but again, this is all hearsay... > > > -- > | --- ___ > | <0> <-> Joe (theWordy) Philbrook > | ^ J(tWdy)P > | ~\___/~ <<jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>> > > But if I actually knew everything, then I'd know I was an idiot... > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
