Re: No Pine, no tripwire.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It would appear that on Apr 12, ne... did say:

> On Apr 12, 2004 at 07:26, dante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in a soothing rage wrote:
> >1. Does anyone know why tripwire was dropped?  Can the maintainers be
> >convinced to re-add it?  (Is this some license issue?  Time to write
> >some replacement?)
> Check the fedora-devel list archives. I believe there was some
> discussion of this there. I believe you will also find a tripwire
> rpm at fedora.us. Dag's repo also has a pine rpm.

One word of caution here. I don't know from direct experience, but I've
heard from several sources that some of the packages from any of the 
freshrpms repositories can conflict with some packages from fedora.us and
livna.org repositories.

Dag is one of several freshrpm repositories. 

So If you decide to get pine from dag (works great BTW) I'd check all
the freshrpms repositories before installing tripwire from fedora.us.

OR if I _was_ getting tripwire from fedora.us, I'd search it and
livna.org for pine.

I've also heard that the pine source tarball does compile and run well
on FC1, but again, this is all hearsay...


-- 
|   ---   ___
|   <0>   <->	   Joe (theWordy) Philbrook
|	^		J(tWdy)P
|    ~\___/~	     <<jtwdyp@xxxxxxxx>>

But if I actually knew everything, then I'd know I was an idiot...



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux