I agree. I don't like the fact that pine isn't included with FC1 However, I installed it no prob. I don't care for mutt, so I installed pine. I think pine should be included with FC Tripwire I don't use. no opinion on that They should include all packages that RH9 had. On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 dante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > <rant> > I'm annoyed that both Fedora Core 1 and Redhat AS do not have either pine > or tripwire. The first I can live without, but I use tripwire on my > servers and would feel very uncomfortable running them without it. > > I know I can always compile and add more stuff from scratch, but then > what's the point of an up2date system. I also know you can create a local > up2date or yum repository, add your own rpm packages, etc. However, with > a package as important as tripwire, should it not be part of the official > release? > </rant> > > <question> > 1. Does anyone know why tripwire was dropped? Can the maintainers be > convinced to re-add it? (Is this some license issue? Time to write > some replacement?) > > 2. Has anyone made a comparison of what packages were dropped/added from > RH9 to FC1 or any of the other Redhat products? > </question> > > Thanks. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. > Director of Information Technology, > D'Youville College, > 320 Porter Ave. > Buffalo NY, 14201 > > Work: (716) 881-8197 (voicemail) > > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list >
