On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 11:10, duncan brown wrote: > i second the motion > > -d > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 08:46:51 -0600 > To: byte@xxxxxxxxxxx,For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: POLICY: Moving discussions around > > > > > That being said, the community *could* decide to keep fedora-list as the > > general list for any stable Fedora Core release, then additionally create a > > yarrow-list specifically for FC1 users and another list specifically for > > FC2 users. Seemed to work fine in previous years... I was always subscribed > > to the general redhat-list and also the specific lists (shrike-list, > > valhalla-list, etc.) related to the versions I had in use. > > > Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods. > > +( duncan brown > +( duncanbrown@xxxxxxxxx > +( http://www.linuxadvocate.net I believe that the "older more experienced users" will upgrade faster, not only because they like to play with new toys, but, have they more confidence in their skills to make stuff work. This could isolate many users from their greater expertise and might slow the growth, not only of Fedora, but Linux in general. We are a community grown from a movement. As a community we should help fellow members and newcomers get established if we want this community to grow. This movement was started in a general spirit of co-operation and will die if this co-operation ceases. We are the friends, family, and members of this community that grew here because of someone's work and help. We need to remember this fact. As a community we need to determine what will help the most users and not choose for our own convenience. I believe also that a more general list would serve this purpose. -- jludwig <wralphie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
