On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 02:32:31PM +1000, Daniel Stonier wrote: > > It could be that the script identifies all the information in an mp3 > file and just translates that just as you might translate a book. If > it does this there'd be next to no degradation at all. But that's not what the script does. It plays the mp3 file and stores the output as a wav file. It then re-encodes that wav file into an ogg file. This is a terrible idea. The mp3 file is a lossy representation of the original sound and when you re-encode it to ogg you're just adding to the loss. Dave... -- If there's something inside that you wanna say Say it out loud it'll be ok
