up2date is a piece of history which should be left behind, and i'm sure alot of people would agree. the fedora.us guys felt that they'd be 100% merged with the redhat fedora team by the release date of fc2, which i don't think is going to happen. i think that fc3 will probably have synaptic/apt/yum all included, which will be interchangable because i also remember reading that the yum/apt teams are working on forming a single standard for the two different products. so, i'd say that in fc3 you'd be able to use synaptic out of the box. i'm sure that it'll be around in the next 6 or so months, if they keep up the pace of releases. -d ----- Original Message ----- From: Martin Alderson <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:35:04 +0100 To: gongolas@xxxxxxxxxxx,For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: will future cd's be apt > > On 4 Apr 2004, at 18:15, S. Gongola wrote: > > > Is the Fedora Core 2 cd's going to be apt enabled > > will redhat enable apt to be used with their up2date servers > > For what it's worth, I agree completly. > > yum has really not been very good for me and apt-get has worked > absolutely perfectly since day one with synaptic and some good > respositries. > > TBH, I don't see why fedora don't just merge the add/remove > applications applet with synaptic and get rid of up2date - it's crap > atm anyway. > > Thats my 2 cents anyway.. > > Martin Alderson, > IntechHosting > > Email: martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Web: http://www.intechhosting.co.uk > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods. +( duncan brown +( duncanbrown@xxxxxxxxx +( http://www.linuxadvocate.net
