the fedora team (the one external to redhat, but still a vital part of fc1/fc2) maintain an apt and yum repository, along with MANY packages that do not come with the standard fc install. http://www.fedora.us and, as far as desktop use is concerned, i think synaptic is better than apt and yum, also =] -d ----- Original Message ----- From: n_powell <nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 21:45:39 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: will future cd's be apt > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 02:35:04 +0100 > thus spake Martin Alderson <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Is the Fedora Core 2 cd's going to be apt enabled > > > will redhat enable apt to be used with their up2date servers > > > > For what it's worth, I agree completly. > > Thats my 2 cents anyway.. > > I would like to third that. Apt is a full head and shoulders above yum. > IMNSHO. I am not sure why it is not part of FC now. - Just incase the > devel team reads any of this :) > > > > =============================== > use perl; > > nathan > nathan_at_lagerbottom_dot_com > www.lagerbottom.com > > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods. +( duncan brown +( duncanbrown@xxxxxxxxx +( http://www.linuxadvocate.net
