Re: suse vs. fedora ?installation size?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gongolas@xxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: suse vs. fedora ?installation size?
From: Brian Chase <networkr0@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 14:36:09 -0400
Cc:
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

Yes, Suse with all the bells and whistles like fedora is over 3 gig, with most everything around 5-6 gig, similar to fedora. If you're short on hard drive space, my guess would be Knoppix hard drive install would be your best bet, then apt-get to load additional stuff selectively.

S. Gongola wrote:

How does fedora installation size compare with a suse installation. Is it around 3-4 gig for a decent install like fedora?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: suse vs. fedora ?installation size?
  - From: Jeff Vian

References:
- suse vs. fedora ?installation size?
  - From: S. Gongola

Prev by Date: Controlling where an application's new child window is created...
Next by Date: Re: Uhm...what's this? [rdate question]
Previous by thread: suse vs. fedora ?installation size?
Next by thread: Re: suse vs. fedora ?installation size?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]