Cowles, Steve wrote:
Mark Neidorff wrote:
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 stucklenp@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
route -n yields
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
IFace
24.159.200.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.252.0 U 0 0 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 eth0
"route print" on Windoze yields:
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface
Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 24.159.200.1 24.159.201.xxx
20
24.159.200.0 255.255.252.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
24.159.201.xxx 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
20
24.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1
1
224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
20
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 24.159.201.xxx 24.159.201.xxx
1
Default Gateway: 24.159.200.1
Is it a typo on your part????? You lease an ip in the
24.159.201 range, but your nic in fedora is in the
24.159.200 range!!!!! That would mess everything up.
Mark
Given the netmask (255.255.252.0), the IP/network address shown above looks
to be correct to me.
Long pause...
Well, except for windoze brain dead TCP/IP stack calculating a classful
broadcast address instead of classless. The correct broadcast address (given
the netmask) should be 24.159.203.255. Oh, and how about the 20 hop metric.
Gezzz! I'm surprised this system is even working on the network.
Steve Cowles
Yeah, But even more interesting is that the windows box, (brain dead as
it is), supposedly works and his linux box doesn't !!!!! This
doesn't look right to me.
