Fedora Users — Re: stability of fedora for server application?

Re: stability of fedora for server application?

Date Prev

Date Next

Thread Prev

Thread Next

Date Index

Thread Index

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: stability of fedora for server application?

From: shane c branch <scbranch@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:24:37 -0500

In-reply-to: <[email protected]>

References: <[email protected]> <1079194459.7068.6.camel@portablepoch> <1079196777.12647.24.camel@aries> <[email protected]>

Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)

WipeOut wrote:

Shockwave wrote:
Overall I have to say I have been extremely satisfied with the performance and reliability of both RHEL and FC. I suppose the only possible down-side I see with FC is that there may not be an easy upgrade path from FC1 to FC2. I'm still waiting to see what happens. If there isn't a way to easily upgrade it means I have to take a couple of highly used servers offline for a time and install FC2 to get all the new goodies. Regardless, I think that the value far outweighs the inconvenience in my situation.

I was under the impression that there would be an upgrade path available from FC1 to FC2.. Is this not the case??

What are specific issues that standout as problem in trying to upgrade from FC1 to FC2?
Later..

I'd be interested to know the same. It also brings up another question: start with FC1 or FC2?

--
regards,

shane