On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Adam Williams wrote: > Because my company relies on a proprietary piece of software that > requires oracle 9, and oracle 9 is only support on rh es 2.1 from our > vendor. oracle 9 isn't going to be supported on the 2.6 kernel in all likelyhood. This might be time to look at seperating some of ryour services. > but since this server will soon be our primary server, the tape > drive autoloader will be on it, and I need large file support for samba > so I can transfers the backups from the other servers to this one to > write to the tape. I was able to get all of the rpms I needed updated, > I foudn what I needed on rpmfind.net. But kernel 2.6 still won't compile :( > > William Hooper wrote: > > >Adam Williams said: > > > > > >>Hi, I know this list is for fedora, but I don't know of an enterprise > >>mail list, > >> > >> > > > >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list > > > > > > > >>and I figured some of you out there may run ES 2.1 and could > >>help. I have a server I need to upgrade to kernel 2.6 for >2GB file > >>size for samba file support. > >> > >> > >[snip] > > > > > >> any suggestions? > >>Thanks! > >> > >> > > > >Since you are invalidating the support anyway, why not try either FC1 or > >one of the FC2 test releases? > > > >Of course if you want to keep support, try RHEL 3. Not sure if it will > >fix the issue or not. > > > > > > > > > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
