On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 19:23, Jim Bradley wrote: > FC1 differs in alot of ways as far as hardware support, but it doesn't > look much different from RH9 as far as the desktop goes, mostly just a > different background. I will say this. I've been having a tougher time > with usb devices under FC1. I din't have any trouble with my usb devices > under rh9. > I don't know about other people, but I went the upgrade route, rather > than a full new install, and it took a long time. About 5 hrs to complete. > > Jim > > Awuku Danso wrote: > > >Hi all > >Just want to know how FC1 differs from RH9. Would anyone say it's an upgrade of RH9 and if so could I install (upgrade) FC1 over RH9? Or does it have to be installed onto a different partition/hard disk? > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > > > This is odd! I have 2 different digital cams a usb2 flash mem stick, a flat bed usb scanner a webcam and a cannon printer. All work fine and i use 2 port at the back of the PC for the printer and scanner the rest I plug in randomly when needed into the front ports. Never even had the slightest hitch and as I said earlier I have 3 months uptime. no reboots. and whats more is I didnt even have driver probs. mmm.
