Re: RH9 and FC1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RH9 and FC1
From: Jim Bradley <bmobile40@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:23:13 +0000
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1: Desktop/LX Amethyst) Gecko/20030509

FC1 differs in alot of ways as far as hardware support, but it doesn't look much different from RH9 as far as the desktop goes, mostly just a different background. I will say this. I've been having a tougher time with usb devices under FC1. I din't have any trouble with my usb devices under rh9. I don't know about other people, but I went the upgrade route, rather than a full new install, and it took a long time. About 5 hrs to complete.

Jim

Awuku Danso wrote:

Hi all
Just want to know how FC1 differs from RH9. Would anyone say it's an upgrade of RH9 and if so could I install (upgrade) FC1 over RH9? Or does it have to be installed onto a different partition/hard disk?

Thanks

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RH9 and FC1
  - From: Chadley Wilson
- Re: RH9 and FC1
  - From: Bevan C. Bennett

References:
- RH9 and FC1
  - From: Awuku Danso

Prev by Date: Re: RH9 and FC1
Next by Date: Re: Resolution on laptop
Previous by thread: Re: RH9 and FC1
Next by thread: Re: RH9 and FC1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux