On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 10:14, WipeOut wrote: > Michael Gargiullo wrote: > > >On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 08:25, Fredrik Holmberg wrote: > > > > > >>What are your experiences on running Fedora (Core 1) as a server, in > >>comparison to the former Red Hat 9 (Shrike)? > >> > >>-- > >>Regards, > >>Fredrik Holmberg > >> > >> > >> > > > >We actually use it in several dozen servers without incident. We maybe > >the exception though. We also run the SMP kernel without a problem. We > >have it running on dual AMD systems, Dual Intel, and Dual Intel Xeon > >boxes. We did have one boot problem on the dual xeon box, but we have > >it running on one of the mail gateways, and it handles everything > >nicely. > > > > > > > > > Have you done either a minimum install or a full install?? > > My minimum install is stable with SMP but my workstation install is not.. > Interesting, I've got 12 machine across the country running with a minimal installation (They run dhcpd, ntp, tftp, and perl scripts in cron) I have a mail server that started with a minimal install, but exim was added, as was spamassassin, and clamscan. I guess I always start with minimal installation, and only add the functions I need the box to run.
