On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 00:51, William Hooper wrote: > Nathan G. Grennan said: > > The difference in speed of release of updates, or the release of the > > updates at all seems to have greatly changed with time between Red Hat > > Linux 9 and Fedora Core 1. > > Have you read the FAQ? > http://fedora.redhat.com/about/faq/ > What is the errata policy for The Fedora Project? > If you want guarantees buy RHEL. I think "buy RHEL" is not a fair answer to the question on the difference in speed of security updates for rh9 and fc1. Note that the faq also says "Security updates will take priority.". > Also, compairing one release to another doesn't make sense. RHL 9 has had > kernel updates that FC 1 didn't need because it was already patched. Are you denying the problem? Are you saying that fc1 is kept up to date just as fast as rh9? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh9-errata.html http://fedoranews.org/updates/
