Re: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
• From: Curt Stauffer <curt02@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:29:01 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1754162.1075483054652.JavaMail.root@wamui08.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
• References: <[email protected] et>
• Reply-to: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Sender: fedora-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

At the risk of showing my ignorance, why not use:

rdate -s <your favorite timeserver>

Works for me, provided it's run as root.

HTH,
-Curt Stauffer
 Emory University
 Atlanta GA USA

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
    • From: Rick Stevens

• References:
  • "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
    • From: Robert P. J. Day

• Prev by Date: Re: production server
• Next by Date: Re: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
• Previous by thread: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
• Next by thread: Re: "ntpdate" versus "ntpd"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread