Re: apt-get, yum or up2date

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:21:41AM +0100, Jan Houtsma wrote:

> In RH9 you only had up2date (as far as i know). Now i see people
> saying: "don't use up2date anymore, but apt-get" Why? Has one of these
> three tools big advantages above the other or is it only what one is
> already used to and then advice others also to do the same?

Apt is pretty cool. I use the Dag apt repository, which tracks all the
stock stuff, plus a pile of extras - pretty much anything you'd want to
add on top of a stock redhat/fedora distribution. All I have to do to
keep everything up to date is apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade.
Nothing could be simpler.

http://dag.wieers.com/packages/apt/




[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux